top of page

48PEGASUS

Make the numbers explain the work.

Bring scattered records into a structure that supports useful reporting and informed decisions. Data work connects source information, consistent definitions and clear presentation so people can understand what happened, investigate a change and decide what to do next.

Start with the decision, not the dashboard. Identify who needs an answer, when they need it and what action it could change. That determines the required sources, level of detail, refresh frequency and limits of the analysis.

Discuss a Data Requirement

Turn records into questions you can answer.

Operational reporting

Track incoming work, completed work, backlog and turnaround time using agreed status and date definitions. Separate volume from performance: a growing backlog may reflect increased demand, reduced capacity or records that are no longer being closed correctly.

Data preparation and consolidation

Combine exports or supported source connections into a usable reporting structure. Map identifiers, standardize dates and categories, and isolate duplicates and incomplete records. Preserve the relationship to source records so a surprising total can be investigated rather than accepted on appearance.

Analysis and decision support

Compare periods, categories and operational segments to locate meaningful changes. Distinguish observed patterns from explanations that still require evidence. Use the analysis to frame options and further questions rather than presenting correlation as proof of a cause.

A useful metric has a definition and a boundary.

Illustrative example: a service team wants to understand completion time. Define the measure as elapsed time from accepted request to recorded completion. Decide whether waiting for client information counts, how reopened requests are treated and which time zone governs timestamps. Separate cancelled requests from completed work.

The report shows request counts, median completion time and the age of open items, with filters for relevant categories. Records missing a start or completion date appear in a quality exception view rather than silently receiving a zero duration. This is an illustrative reporting design, not a client result.

Deliver the definitions behind the display.

A data scope identifies source systems, access methods, record relationships and the questions to answer. Deliverables can include field mappings, cleaned datasets, transformation logic, metric definitions, dashboards, recurring reports and an analysis of findings. A metric dictionary explains the calculation, included population, exclusions and update schedule.

The handover identifies source dependencies, refresh procedures, access roles and known quality limitations. Where scheduled processing is included, define how failed loads are detected and how users know the report is stale. Presentation files alone are not a substitute for reproducible calculations.

Inspect the data before committing to the conclusion.

Bring representative exports, existing reports and the decisions they are intended to support. Identify source owners, record identifiers, business definitions and access restrictions. Explain known process changes that could make one period difficult to compare with another.

Profile missing values, duplicates, date ranges and category inconsistencies. Agree definitions with the people who use and produce the records. Build transformations, reconcile sample results to the source and review an initial report before expanding its coverage. Keep unresolved quality issues visible.

Reconcile the result back to its source.

Check row counts, distinct identifiers, totals and representative individual records at each important transformation. Test joins for accidental duplication, date filters for boundary errors and denominators for unintended exclusions. A visually plausible chart can still be mathematically wrong.

Test refresh failures, late-arriving records and changes to source fields. Confirm that access controls apply to underlying data as well as the visible report. Review conclusions separately from calculations: a correct percentage does not establish a causal explanation or make an incomplete sample representative.

Keep reporting understandable after handover.

Establish who controls source access, reporting accounts, datasets and transformation code or configuration. Define export requirements and licensed platform dependencies. Restrict sensitive detail to the people who need it; an executive summary does not require unrestricted access to every underlying record.

Assign owners for metric definitions, quality corrections and refresh monitoring. Changes to source systems or business processes can change the meaning of a report even when it still loads successfully. Ongoing monitoring, revisions and support are specified in the engagement.

Questions worth resolving early.

Can this start with spreadsheets?

Yes. A controlled set of spreadsheets may be sufficient for a focused analysis or reporting workflow. The important questions are consistency, access, volume and update responsibility. Move to a more structured system when the work requires it, not simply to replace a familiar tool.

Does a dashboard need real-time data?

Only if a timely action depends on it. Daily, weekly or on-demand updates may fit the decision better and reduce complexity. Agree how current the data must be and show its last successful refresh so users understand what they are viewing.

Can the analysis forecast future performance?

Forecasting requires enough relevant history, a defensible method and explicit assumptions. Changes in demand or process can make past behavior less informative. Where forecasting is appropriate, present uncertainty and test performance against held-out observations rather than treating one projection as a promise.

Use evidence to support responsible decisions.

Suitable projects improve understanding and create practical and societal value. Reporting must not hide material exclusions, manufacture support for a preferred conclusion or expose sensitive information without a legitimate need.

Describe the decision, the sources available and what is difficult to establish today. Include a redacted sample or current report when possible. Begin with the question the data needs to answer—not the number of charts to produce.

Discuss a Data Requirement

Technology Solutions & Business Services

bottom of page